Hours for Sound Family Medicine on Sunrise Boulevard

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Periodical of Medicine reveals that when meaning women are given covid vaccinations during their beginning or second trimesters, they endure an 82% spontaneous ballgame rate, killing four out of five unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the information published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Significant Persons." Simply as disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions past obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention past a Life Site News commodity, nosotros checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Yes, the report shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or 2nd trimesters.
2. Yep, the report authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this study was near certainly a embrace-upwardly to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly condom. But the study data really evidence quite the oppose.

Here'due south how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the tertiary trimester

Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 meaning women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You lot have to read the fine print below the table to encounter this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or 2d trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hitting the 20-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the tabular array.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the showtime 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their start or second trimesters calculates to an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

Information technology is important to notation that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their start or second trimesters.

Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the get-go time during her 3rd trimester to accept a "spontaneous abortion" in the first xx weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first xx weeks of gestation, at least in this data fix. (It's a small gear up of 127 pregnant women, so we'd like to encounter a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear pic.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple fashion to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and l limes, with a science study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellowish?" The scientists count all the xanthous fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 considering there are 100 total slice of fruit, and so they declare, "l% of lemons are yellow" because it'southward l/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't perchance be included because they're limes, not lemons. So the correct math is l/fifty, which means 100% of the lemons are xanthous. That'due south the correct answer.

In this scientific discipline newspaper, they are using 827 equally the denominator, fifty-fifty when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous ballgame" can occur. And since meaning women aren't time travelers, they tin can't go back in time and report a spontaneous ballgame from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with quack obfuscation of the numbers — and then "scientific discipline" has already failed its cadre promise: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the world around u.s..

Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the start 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion charge per unit is only 12.6%. Why? Because they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, almost probable.

In fact, the cardinal author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is besides named in numerous other studies that claim to certificate adverse reactions in diverse vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same fault in other studies that ended vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For example, here's some other report he co-authored: "Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Agin Effect Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That written report ended, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected prophylactic concerns after TIV-ID."

But is that determination based on bad math, like the written report on covid vaccines given to meaning women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the get-go time one author was found to have fabricated systematic mistakes beyond dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how scientific discipline progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can't only take bad math and telephone call it "scientific discipline" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Fasten poly peptide injections into significant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean fourth dimension, information technology's clear that 4 out of five pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least, according to the small data gear up we have so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly equally globalists hoped they would.

Call up: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine fasten proteins direct attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human being cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of 2 medical journals. Although he does not characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking significant women and causing more than than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls information technology an "barbarism" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You lot tin can hear him in his own words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet by iii.ii meg over the next twelvemonth, in the USA alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the start 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies existence murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is existence called a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and science accept turned against humanity. They are at present killing babies past the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land management czar in one case characterized human children as an "environmental run a risk."

This is a state of war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes across mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race past the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to help humanity, but are now clearly shown to exist working towards humanity's destruction.

Learn more than in today's mind-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

barnettsirold.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post